Definitions of semantical reference and self-reference.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Self reference in word definitions
Dictionaries are inherently circular in nature. A given word is linked to a set of alternative words (the definition) which in turn point to further descendants. Iterating through definitions in this way, one typically finds that definitions loop back upon themselves. The graph formed by such definitional relations is our object of study. By eliminating those links which are not in loops, we ar...
متن کاملa comparative study of language learning strategies employmed by bilinguals and monolinguals with reference to attitudes and motivation
هدف از این تحقیق بررسی برخی عوامل ادراکی واحساسی یعنی استفاده از شیوه های یادگیری زبان ، انگیزه ها ونگرش نسبت به زبان انگلیسی در رابطه با زمینه زبانی زبان آموزان می باشد. هدف بررسی این نکته بود که آیا اختلافی چشمگیر میان زبان آموزان دو زبانه و تک زبانه در میزان استفاده از شیوه های یادگیری زبان ، انگیزه ها نگرش و سطح مهارت زبانی وجود دارد. همچنین سعی شد تا بهترین و موثرترین عوامل پیش بینی کننده ...
15 صفحه اولVarieties of Self-Reference
The significance of any system of explicit representation depends not only on the immediate properties of its representational structures, but also on two aspects of the attendant circumstances: implicit relations among, and processes defined over, those individual representations, and larger circumstances in the world in which the whole representational system is embedded. This relativity of r...
متن کاملSelf-reference in Arithmetic∗
AGödel sentence is oen described as a sentence saying about itself that it is not provable and a Henkin sentence as a sentence stating its own provability. We discuss what it couldmean for a sentence to ascribe to itself a property such as provability or unprovability. e starting point will be the answer Kreisel gave to Henkin’s problem. We describe how the properties of the supposedly self-re...
متن کاملTranslatable Self-Reference
Stephen Read has advanced a solution of certain semantic paradoxes recently, based on the work of Thomas Bradwardine. One consequence of this approach, however, is that if Socrates utters only ‘Socrates utters a falsehood’ (a), while Plato says ‘Socrates utters a falsehood’ (b), then, for Bradwardine two different propositions are involved on account of (a) being self-referential, while (b) is ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
سال: 1976
ISSN: 0029-4527
DOI: 10.1305/ndjfl/1093887434